The $1.6 million transfer balance cap revisitedBY KIMBERLEY NOAH, WILLIAM FETTES | VOLUME 11, ISSUE 4  The $1.6 million transfer balance cap (TBC) imposes a limit on the total amount that a fund member can transfer into an exempt (retirement phase) pension. The TBC was introduced ... Get articles like this delivered to your email - Sign up for the free weekly newsletter  More Articles |
Latest News
Vanguard Super leads in organic growth: KPMG
|Vanguard Super was the super fund with the highest organic growth rate in FY24, both in terms of assets under management (AUM) and membership, according to a KPMG report.
UniSuper lifts fund manager investment to $100m
|UniSuper has increased its investment in venture fund manager Uniseed by $25 million, taking its total commitment to $100 million.
Chalmers and Bragg spar over $3m super tax
|Treasurer Jim Chalmers is maintaining politicians will be captured by the $3 million super tax, labelling commentary to the contrary as lies.
Size of super impacting capital markets
|The huge amount of capital that flows through superannuation funds may be limiting the success of IPOs in Australia, an industry conference has heard.
Further Reading
Cover Story
Climbing to the top
DANIEL SHRIMSKI
MANAGING DIRECTOR
VANGUARD INVESTMENTS AUSTRALIA LTD
MANAGING DIRECTOR
VANGUARD INVESTMENTS AUSTRALIA LTD
Vanguard Australia managing director Daniel Shrimski is determined to propel the investment giant's superannuation product into the top 10 funds by assets under management by 2030. It's an audacious goal, even for a fund backed by the world's second largest asset manager. Andrew McKean writes.
Expert Feed
Inflows into fixed income ETFs gather pace
While the penetration of fixed income into the ETF structure has lagged way behind equities, we expect flows to accelerate.
Managing uncertainty in a rapidly changing economic landscape
As we distill the first quarter's volatility and confusion, there is further economic moderation ahead with sizable risks to the downside.
AI, alternative data and sustainability in focus
As AI and alternative data reshape quantitative investing, here are some key insights from discussions with institutional investors.
Transforming member apathy and boosting engagement for super funds
To bring about meaningful change, it's crucial to understand how members currently perceive their fund, an understanding that allows providers to pinpoint ...
You have correctly addressed certain aspects of the TBC which could be regarded as unfair or at best applying unequally to persons on a Super related Pension. However, I would like to raise another issue resulting from the introduction of the TBC which I regard as unfair and which only applies to persons who do not own a home. As no consideration is given to such persons in deterring their TBC this results in a situation where such persons are in my opinion grossly disadvantaged in comparison to those who do own a home. There are many persons who have for example just about their TBC or not much more in their Super savings but have always rented or chosen to rent in preference to home ownership. Now, if those people purchased a home and consequently reduced their Pension they would be eligible (given all other factors are equal), to claim up to a full old age pension from the Government's coffers. So I believe one can fairly argue that such persons are grossly disadvantaged in comparison to people who for example own a $2M (or more), home but still get the benefit of the full TBC.