The $1.6 million transfer balance cap revisitedBY KIMBERLEY NOAH, WILLIAM FETTES | VOLUME 11, ISSUE 4  The $1.6 million transfer balance cap (TBC) imposes a limit on the total amount that a fund member can transfer into an exempt (retirement phase) pension. The TBC was introduced ... Get articles like this delivered to your email - Sign up for the free weekly newsletter  More Articles |
Latest News
ATO helps return over $1bn in super
The ATO has helped return over $1.1 billion in unpaid super to over 900,000 Australians in FY26, a significant increase from $795 million in the previous financial year.
NZ Super terminates internal active NZ equites mandate
Following the completion of a review of its investment management, NZ Super has decided to terminate its internally managed fundamental active equities mandate for New Zealand equities, while welcoming a new portfolio manager for alternative investments.
MLC Expand taps private equity owner's US network on AI
MLC Expand's new private equity owner is helping the platform leverage its US network to fast-track its AI capabilities, chief executive Liz McCarthy said.
Australian Ethical ups fees across most super options
Australian Ethical has increased fees across most of its superannuation investment options shortly after decreasing them earlier in the year.
Further Reading
Cover Story
In the right place
VASYL NAIR
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
TEAM SUPERANNUATION FUND
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
TEAM SUPERANNUATION FUND
Team Super chief executive Vasyl Nair reflects on the winding path from law to superannuation, the people who shaped him and the changing role of super funds in people's lives. Vinny Vucago writes.
Expert Feed
New world order: How to invest under financial repression
The era in which capital flowed towards the highest returns is giving way to one where governments have increasing influence where savings are invested.
Private credit: Reality check
Private credit has become the financial market's favorite source of anxiety. That concern is understandable. But it is also overdone.
A perfect storm for retirees and the critical moment for advice
Twelve months ago, I wrote in FS Super about the importance of trust and stability in Australia's retirement system. One year on, that need has only become ...
GP Stakes: A new source of diversification and yield for investors
Talk to investors about private markets right now and it quickly comes back to the same point of frustration: cash isn't coming back fast enough.
You have correctly addressed certain aspects of the TBC which could be regarded as unfair or at best applying unequally to persons on a Super related Pension. However, I would like to raise another issue resulting from the introduction of the TBC which I regard as unfair and which only applies to persons who do not own a home. As no consideration is given to such persons in deterring their TBC this results in a situation where such persons are in my opinion grossly disadvantaged in comparison to those who do own a home. There are many persons who have for example just about their TBC or not much more in their Super savings but have always rented or chosen to rent in preference to home ownership. Now, if those people purchased a home and consequently reduced their Pension they would be eligible (given all other factors are equal), to claim up to a full old age pension from the Government's coffers. So I believe one can fairly argue that such persons are grossly disadvantaged in comparison to people who for example own a $2M (or more), home but still get the benefit of the full TBC.