Enhancing TPD sustainability in AustraliaBY BINDU GEORGE | VOLUME 16, ISSUE 1Key regulatory and industry bodies such as the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA),1 the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC),2 the Actuaries Institute,3 and the Australasian Life Underwriting and Claims Association (ALUCA)4 have stressed the importance of robust financial controls in maintaining the viability of TPD insurance. This article explores the central role that financial controls play in ensuring that TPD benefits remain relevant and sustainable, drawing on insights and recommendations from these leading institutions.
A primary concern in TPD insurance today is the provision of benefits that exceed the necessary replacement of estimated future income loss. In 2022, the industry recorded its first loss for individual lump sum payments in many years.5 APRA has been actively reviewing TPD insurance to address sustainability issues within the industry.6 Similarly, ASIC has highlighted ongoing gaps, despite the progress in strengthening the TPD safety net.7 The Actuaries Institute's Disability Insurance Taskforce has also urged life insurers to consider the interaction between lump sum and income protection benefits.8 In July 2024, ALUCA published a consultation paper addressing the ongoing sustainability of TPD insurance. This paper identifies five key challenges:
The rationale behind determining the suitable income multiple is straightforward: it considers the future earning potential based on the number of active working years remaining and assumes that the individual's income will remain stable. Most insurers further consider any mortgage and future educational expenses for dependent children. The TPD cover is further adjusted for inflation and added as an optional rider to the policy. Generally, the TPD benefit is calculated using gross annual income, without accounting for personal income tax. While this method is generally well-founded, it has some potential gaps. The following example underscores the shortcomings of current financial underwriting methods. Let's examine a case study of a 35-year-old applicant with an annual income of AUD 80,000 seeking TPD insurance. Table 1 outlines the underwriting calculation for TPD. Get articles like this delivered to your email - Sign up for the free weekly newsletter ![]() More Articles |
Latest News
UniSuper delivers 10.3% to members
|TelstraSuper Balanced option makes 9.3%
|Brighter Super default members earn 11% in FY25
Mercer SmartPath returns exceed 12%
Cover Story

Climbing to the top
MANAGING DIRECTOR
VANGUARD INVESTMENTS AUSTRALIA LTD