Why big super's pseudo-SMSF won't deliverBY KRIS KITTO | FRIDAY, 7 MAY 2021 11:55AMAs the success of SMSFs boomed in the last decade, some industry funds rolled out self-directed or member direct investment options that allowed their members to invest (with ... Upgrade your subscription to access this article
Join the growing community of superannuation
professionals with unlimited access to our latest news, research and analysis of the industry.
Become a premium subscriber today. |
Latest News
Up to two million Aussies could face super tax: FSC
New modelling from the Financial Services Council (FSC) shows that up to 1.8 million Australians currently in the workforce could be impacted by the proposed superannuation tax under one of the four scenarios.
MP says Coalition will 'fight to the death' over $3m super tax
Nationals Senator Matt Canavan says the Coalition will "fight to the death" to ensure the taxing of unrealised capital gains is abandoned.
HESTA turns the lights back on after service shutdown
HESTA has completed the transition of its member administration services to GROW Inc, restoring online services after a seven-week disruption to transactions and app access.
Super needs customised, personalised approach: FSC
The Financial Services Council (FSC) says superannuation funds have the power to provide a sophisticated and personalised approach to meet members' retirement needs and must prioritise this amid the government applying pressure via the Retirement Income Covenant and the proposed Best Practice Principles ...
Further Reading
Cover Story

Climbing to the top
DANIEL SHRIMSKI
MANAGING DIRECTOR
VANGUARD INVESTMENTS AUSTRALIA LTD
MANAGING DIRECTOR
VANGUARD INVESTMENTS AUSTRALIA LTD
Vanguard Australia managing director Daniel Shrimski is determined to propel the investment giant's superannuation product into the top 10 funds by assets under management by 2030. It's an audacious goal, even for a fund backed by the world's second largest asset manager. Andrew McKean writes.
Thankyou Kris for your insights. To address your suggestion that big super funds pull money out of investment portfolios to cover future tax liabilities: in fact, they don't - they create an accounting provision for deferred taxes in valuing member accounts but this accounting liability is not backed by cash. It is essentially a gearing effect as the money remains invested to earn compounded returns until the tax is actually payable. This is really the same as SMSFs; it's just that the deferred tax liabilities are made explicit in the member account valuation. The point is that both types of funds can earn compounded investment returns until the tax actually has to be paid.
Just wanted to point out this article is inaccurate and probably misleading. Pseudo-SMSFs let each member who chooses to use them to accumulate unrealised gains just like an SMSF. Additionally some of them also allow members to transfer their investments in specie to the retirement phase and to directly benefit through the unrealised gain provision being removed boosting the balance available for retirement income.