Why big super's pseudo-SMSF won't deliverBY KRIS KITTO | FRIDAY, 7 MAY 2021 11:55AMAs the success of SMSFs boomed in the last decade, some industry funds rolled out self-directed or member direct investment options that allowed their members to invest (with ... Upgrade your subscription to access this article
Join the growing community of superannuation
professionals with unlimited access to our latest news, research and analysis of the industry.
Become a premium subscriber today. |
Latest News
FSC links active super choices to stronger retirement outcomes
|Australians who actively engage with their superannuation and seek financial advice could significantly improve their retirement outcomes, according to new research commissioned by the Financial Services Council (FSC).
Operational changes anticipated for Payday Super: Rest
Two-thirds of Australian businesses expect Payday Super will require moderate to significant operational changes, despite widespread confidence in their ability to comply with the reforms due to take effect from 1 July 2026.
Small fee increases cost nest eggs $77k: Vanguard
A new analysis from Vanguard Australia shows superannuation funds charging marginal fee increases can cost members $77,000 in retirement.
MySuper assets pursue $1.5tn Choice sector
MySuper assets are fast catching up to the $1.5 trillion Choice sector, hitting nearly $1.2 trillion in the March quarter.
Further Reading
Cover Story

Leading the way
SHARON DAVIS
NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
FUTURE GROUP AUSTRALIA HOLDINGS PTY LTD
NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
FUTURE GROUP AUSTRALIA HOLDINGS PTY LTD
Sharon Davis has always been fascinated by the human condition; it has driven her passion for people, her career, and building a better future for the next generation and beyond. Eliza Bavin writes.









Thankyou Kris for your insights. To address your suggestion that big super funds pull money out of investment portfolios to cover future tax liabilities: in fact, they don't - they create an accounting provision for deferred taxes in valuing member accounts but this accounting liability is not backed by cash. It is essentially a gearing effect as the money remains invested to earn compounded returns until the tax is actually payable. This is really the same as SMSFs; it's just that the deferred tax liabilities are made explicit in the member account valuation. The point is that both types of funds can earn compounded investment returns until the tax actually has to be paid.
Just wanted to point out this article is inaccurate and probably misleading. Pseudo-SMSFs let each member who chooses to use them to accumulate unrealised gains just like an SMSF. Additionally some of them also allow members to transfer their investments in specie to the retirement phase and to directly benefit through the unrealised gain provision being removed boosting the balance available for retirement income.