When super funds go to warBY ALEX DUNNIN | FRIDAY, 11 MAR 2022 1:35PMIt seems Australian government political leaders, are beginning to understand how global capital markets really work. Yes, central banks and big business are important, but a ... Upgrade your subscription to access this article
Join the growing community of superannuation
professionals with unlimited access to our latest news, research and analysis of the industry.
Become a premium subscriber today. |
Latest News
ATO helps return over $1bn in super
The ATO has helped return over $1.1 billion in unpaid super to over 900,000 Australians in FY26, a significant increase from $795 million in the previous financial year.
NZ Super terminates internal active NZ equites mandate
Following the completion of a review of its investment management, NZ Super has decided to terminate its internally managed fundamental active equities mandate for New Zealand equities, while welcoming a new portfolio manager for alternative investments.
MLC Expand taps private equity owner's US network on AI
MLC Expand's new private equity owner is helping the platform leverage its US network to fast-track its AI capabilities, chief executive Liz McCarthy said.
Australian Ethical ups fees across most super options
Australian Ethical has increased fees across most of its superannuation investment options shortly after decreasing them earlier in the year.
Further Reading
Cover Story

In the right place
VASYL NAIR
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
TEAM SUPERANNUATION FUND
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
TEAM SUPERANNUATION FUND
Team Super chief executive Vasyl Nair reflects on the winding path from law to superannuation, the people who shaped him and the changing role of super funds in people's lives. Vinny Vucago writes.









Thanks Alex for your usual clarity of thought and brave insights. The political u-turn, with the Government now trying to court APRA-regulated funds, is mind-boggling. The precedent is interesting: in the new YFYS performance-benchmarked world, meeting the benchmark becomes paramount. What if divesting Russian assets had created material tracking error and jeopardised performance v this test? While Russia divestment doesn't, what if the next thing the Government recruits large funds for does? How on earth will funds reconcile these conflicting, yet both potentially existential, duties?