When super funds go to warBY ALEX DUNNIN | FRIDAY, 11 MAR 2022 1:35PMIt seems Australian government political leaders, are beginning to understand how global capital markets really work. Yes, central banks and big business are important, but a ... Upgrade your subscription to access this article
Join the growing community of superannuation
professionals with unlimited access to our latest news, research and analysis of the industry.
Become a premium subscriber today. |
Latest News
FSC links active super choices to stronger retirement outcomes
|Australians who actively engage with their superannuation and seek financial advice could significantly improve their retirement outcomes, according to new research commissioned by the Financial Services Council (FSC).
Operational changes anticipated for Payday Super: Rest
Two-thirds of Australian businesses expect Payday Super will require moderate to significant operational changes, despite widespread confidence in their ability to comply with the reforms due to take effect from 1 July 2026.
Small fee increases cost nest eggs $77k: Vanguard
A new analysis from Vanguard Australia shows superannuation funds charging marginal fee increases can cost members $77,000 in retirement.
MySuper assets pursue $1.5tn Choice sector
MySuper assets are fast catching up to the $1.5 trillion Choice sector, hitting nearly $1.2 trillion in the March quarter.
Further Reading
Cover Story

Leading the way
SHARON DAVIS
NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
FUTURE GROUP AUSTRALIA HOLDINGS PTY LTD
NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
FUTURE GROUP AUSTRALIA HOLDINGS PTY LTD
Sharon Davis has always been fascinated by the human condition; it has driven her passion for people, her career, and building a better future for the next generation and beyond. Eliza Bavin writes.









Thanks Alex for your usual clarity of thought and brave insights. The political u-turn, with the Government now trying to court APRA-regulated funds, is mind-boggling. The precedent is interesting: in the new YFYS performance-benchmarked world, meeting the benchmark becomes paramount. What if divesting Russian assets had created material tracking error and jeopardised performance v this test? While Russia divestment doesn't, what if the next thing the Government recruits large funds for does? How on earth will funds reconcile these conflicting, yet both potentially existential, duties?