Market for lemons: Why super fund members don't want to pay for adviceBY JASON ANDRIESSEN | THURSDAY, 1 FEB 2018 4:54PMIt's a shame for super funds that so few of their members access advice in the years around retirement. For members, accessing advice supports better financial decisions, which ... Upgrade your subscription to access this article
Join the growing community of superannuation
professionals with unlimited access to our latest news, research and analysis of the industry.
Become a premium subscriber today. |
Latest News
Emerging markets, private assets lift NGS Super FY26 performance
Emerging markets, commodities and maturing private assets took the shine away from equities, helping deliver nearly 12% p.a. for NGS Super members over the last financial year.
Labor commits to compulsory super for under-18 workers
Labor has unanimously supported extending superannuation to under-18 Australian workers.
Aware Super acquires $226m real estate investment
Aware Real Estate has expanded its Sydney CBD office portfolio, acquiring a 50% stake in 100 Market Street for approximately $226 million in a move that strengthens its exposure to prime commercial real estate.
Fight between SMC and FSC on super rages on
The Super Members Council (SMC) has called out the Financial Services Council (FSC) on making selective claims about performance and costs of 'platform' super funds compared with performance-tested mainstream MySuper funds.
Further Reading
Cover Story

Leading the way
SHARON DAVIS
NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
FUTURE GROUP AUSTRALIA HOLDINGS PTY LTD
NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
FUTURE GROUP AUSTRALIA HOLDINGS PTY LTD
Sharon Davis has always been fascinated by the human condition; it has driven her passion for people, her career, and building a better future for the next generation and beyond. Eliza Bavin writes.









There is an assumption in this article that low cost advice must be poor quality. What we are seeing though is that technology is enabling lower cost advice to be better quality than high quality advice. We might not quite be there yet, but watch this space.
This article rings true for me. Over many years I have found that, by spending considerable time with a client showing them modelling etc., they begin to understand the value of advice and are willing to pay for it. The challenge is to be able to spend sufficient time in the approach without scaring the prospective client away with price. I have developed the attitude that, like many other businesses, we are "tendering" for new work and this is a built-in cost to the business so our fees attempt to "recoup" this cost. The "charge by the hour" philosophy does not work if this is your model.
The ability to deliver quality advice to members cost effectively is here and we are currently trialling with a few funds. For most members their advice needs are relatively straight forward and can easily be met with a hybrid approach combining a digital advice tool at the core with advisors supporting the platform. The advent of new technology has meant that we can now replace many low advice tasks digitally and let advisors focus on delivering high value. We have come a long way since we launched Snowball in the late 1990's.