Employee benefits- better in superBY JEFFREY SCOTT | VOLUME 4, ISSUE 1In this time of fiscal responsibility, businesses need to weigh the costs and benefits of any expenditure. At the same time, employers want to retain good employees and accordingly ... Get articles like this delivered to your email - Sign up for the free weekly newsletter More Articles |
Latest News
Netwealth profit hit by First Guardian costs
|Netwealth reported record underlying earnings and funds under administration in FY26, though its statutory result was weighed down by $74 million in after-tax costs related to the First Gurdian Master Fund collapse.
ART strikes $883m QLD Westfield deal
Australian Retirement Trust (ART) has agreed to acquire a 50% interest in Brisbane's Westfield Mt Gravatt from Scentre Group for $882.5 million, in what is expected to be Australia's largest single-asset retail transaction this year.
HESTA reduces fees, minimum balance for income stream
HESTA will reduce administration fees and lower the minimum balance required to start an income stream account from September 30.
Trustees, platforms, cyber risk under APRA spotlight
Superannuation trustees, platforms and cyber resilience will be under more scrutiny in the 2027 financial year from the prudential regulator.
Further Reading
Cover Story

Leading the way
SHARON DAVIS
NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
FUTURE GROUP AUSTRALIA HOLDINGS PTY LTD
NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
FUTURE GROUP AUSTRALIA HOLDINGS PTY LTD
Sharon Davis has always been fascinated by the human condition; it has driven her passion for people, her career, and building a better future for the next generation and beyond. Eliza Bavin writes.









I'm surprised that there was no mention in the article of the impact of lower cont caps on SCI arrangements. An old fogey on a decent salary (like me) can end up having a big chunk of their cont cap chewed up by SCI premiums. Isn't it likely that funds will find a way to help members take their SCI outside super (where they'll still get a deduction for the premiums) and free up more of their cap?
Excellent article.
I'm surprised that there was no mention in the article of the impact of lower cont caps on SCI arrangements. An old fogey on a decent salary (like me) can end up having a big chunk of their cont cap chewed up by SCI premiums. Isn't it likely that funds will find a way to help members take their SCI outside super (where they'll still get a deduction for the premiums) and free up more of their cap?