Employee benefits- better in superBY JEFFREY SCOTT | VOLUME 4, ISSUE 1In this time of fiscal responsibility, businesses need to weigh the costs and benefits of any expenditure. At the same time, employers want to retain good employees and accordingly ... Get articles like this delivered to your email - Sign up for the free weekly newsletter ![]() More Articles |
Latest News
UK treasury provides guidance on local pension consolidation
The Pension Investment Review aims to consolidate smaller public pension and multi-employer defined contribution pension schemes into 'megafunds' to emulate Australian and Canadian investing models.
Quality over quantity: CareSuper on mergers
The dust has barely settled on the merger that created CareSuper as it is today and chief executive Jason Murray is gearing up for another in mere months - but he's not looking to make a habit of it.
Industry funds feast, retail funds snack, corporate funds freefall
APRA's quarterly superannuation statistics have lifted the lid on the ongoing battle for Australia's retirement assets.
QSuper settles $67m class action
QSuper, which merged with Sunsuper to create Australian Retirement Trust (ART), Australia's second-largest super fund, has reached a $67 million out-of-court settlement over claims members were overcharged for life insurance premiums.
Further Reading
Cover Story

Climbing to the top
DANIEL SHRIMSKI
MANAGING DIRECTOR
VANGUARD INVESTMENTS AUSTRALIA LTD
MANAGING DIRECTOR
VANGUARD INVESTMENTS AUSTRALIA LTD
Vanguard Australia managing director Daniel Shrimski is determined to propel the investment giant's superannuation product into the top 10 funds by assets under management by 2030. It's an audacious goal, even for a fund backed by the world's second largest asset manager. Andrew McKean writes.
I'm surprised that there was no mention in the article of the impact of lower cont caps on SCI arrangements. An old fogey on a decent salary (like me) can end up having a big chunk of their cont cap chewed up by SCI premiums. Isn't it likely that funds will find a way to help members take their SCI outside super (where they'll still get a deduction for the premiums) and free up more of their cap?
Excellent article.
I'm surprised that there was no mention in the article of the impact of lower cont caps on SCI arrangements. An old fogey on a decent salary (like me) can end up having a big chunk of their cont cap chewed up by SCI premiums. Isn't it likely that funds will find a way to help members take their SCI outside super (where they'll still get a deduction for the premiums) and free up more of their cap?